🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are more and more enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a new research carried out in Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has unwittingly benefited radical groups by validating their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six national newspapers.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central themes like assimilation and immigration, established political groups progressively adapted their communication in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such stances were legitimate.

Implications for Democracy

"Political discourse by mainstream political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was noticeable even when conventional parties were criticising the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Effect Throughout the Continent

While the research was focused on the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations across Europe.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," said another researcher. "The far right says something and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At times, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a then national leader called for widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found across the continent, as elected officials from countries ranging from the UK to France embrace the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the far right, even as research indicates that doing so drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered revealed that the influence of radical parties had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," stated a co-author. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Develop Their Distinct Narratives

The study emphasized the need for mainstream political parties to carve out their own discourses, particularly on subjects such as migration and integration, rather than continuously following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one author. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."